Peoples' movements and protests |
MobilizationsThe city movement in AmsterdamThe city movement in MadridIMF uprisingsThe South African anti-privatization movementThe English motorway resistanceBack to Movements for the commonsBack to main page
|
The urban movement in Amsterdam
In Amsterdam, there was little social housing policy after World War II. On the other hand, there were far-reaching plans by the authorities for office and motorway projects in the city center. As a result, houses were emptied pending demolition. As the legal housing market was closed, there was not much choice for young people other than occupying empty houses illegally, which also began to happen on a large scale in the mid-sixties. In 1968, the authorities
announced all their intentions in a single plan, which also made
clear the effort to deport large sections of
the inner city’s inhabitants. As a result, the residents organized.
There were three components to the organization. The other was the residents, who were more than happy to see the young people take care of the empty houses to prevent further destruction. They were drawn to a not insignificant extent into the youth culture. The third was the cultural elite of the upper middle class, who saw Amsterdam’s large sixteenth-century city center as a unique world heritage site that could not be destroyed. Gradually, a fourth component was added that gave the victory to the city movement. These were large parts of the welfare alliance between the labour movement and the social bureaucracy, gathered in the Social Democratic Party. They could not understand how to evacuate people without there being somewhere for them to move. In 1978, that fly took over the party majority and the demolition plans were scrapped. Reading
|