Peoples' movements and protests


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Mobilizations
The French Revolution
The republican movement
The Russian revolution
IMF uprisings
 
Back to Bread seizures
Back to Civil rights movements
Back to Old movements
Back to main page

 

French Revolution

 

 

 

 

 

The event that established the concept of ”citizenship” in relation to the state. Until then, one had always been a citizen of a local community.

A triangular struggle between a corrupt court, a bourgeoisie that wanted to make the state more effective in taking up the struggle with England, and the ”people”, artisans and peasants, who tried to keep both of these as far away from themselves as possible.

The conditions ripened gradually during the 1770s-80s. A speculation economy developed where capital owners tried to cut between producers and consumers instead of invest in production. For example, the price of grain was let loose. Prices tripled or quadrupled, and starvation spread. Desperate non-agriculturalists captured grain transports and bakeries, while the government called the army. Contemporaries talked about "the grain war".

In 1789 the government convened a parliament because it needed to replenish the treasury, whereby the bourgeoisie saw a chance to put thumbscrews on the court. But the ”people” were given an early opportunity to assert themselves because, through a series of simultaneous bread uprisings and local revolts against increased prices, it vigorously established a political presence that the bourgeoisie must take into account.

In the early stages of the revolution, the representatives of the bourgeoisie tried to build an alliance with some peasants and with the artisans of Paris in order to exert pressure on the court. But the artisans quickly gained an advantage because the plantation slaves in Haiti revolted at the same time, which ruined large parts of the bourgeoisie that had invested in sugar.

What gave rhythm to the event was that the high food prices that the bread uprisings were protests against did not fall, because the harvests remained bad. Thus the riots continued and became increasingly threatening. At the same time, the German emperor had sent armies against Paris to quell the revolution.

Therefore, the bourgeoisie became increasingly dependent on keeping up well with artisans and peasants to get soldiers. In Paris, the artisans was self-controlled, and the peasants in large parts of the country divided the estates among themselves.
After the defeat of the German armies, a general Bonaparte was able to carry out a coup and establish a military dictatorship, after which the popular successes were rolled back. But the visions from the height of the revolution – free and equal direct producers who govern themselves and has the power to repel foreign armies – still remained alive for over a hundred years.

Reading
Pioneer: Piotr Kropotkin: Great French Revolution, e.g. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, 1971 (there are many)
More modern: P.M. Jones: The peasantry in the French revolution, Cambridge University Press 1988
Shirley Elson Roessler: Out of the shadows - Women and politics in the French revolution, Peter Lang Publishing 1996.
Norman Hampson: A social history of the French revolution, Routledge 1963.

Link
Florence Gauthier: Political Economy in the Eighteenth Century: Popular or Despotic? The Physiocrats Against the Right to Existence

 

Publicerad av Folkrörelsestudiegruppen: info@folkrorelser.org

www.folkrorelser.org