Mobilizations
Latin American wars of independence
North American war of independence
Slave uprising in Haiti
Irish nationalism and Sinn Féin
Russian revolution
India independence movement
Chinese revolution
Algerian war of independence
Palestinian movement
Vietnam war
Breton movement
Basque movement
Norwegian opposition to EU
 
Back to National movements
Back to main page
 
 
 

 

 

National movements

 

 

 

 

 

Because power is organized from a center, there are always ”peripheries” or ”provinces” where people are disadvantaged in various ways due to their powerlessness. Investments are decided elsewhere, outsiders decide who in the periphery is allowed to make a career, and outsiders decide which cultural codes are to apply – the codes of the periphery or province are considered backward, rural and quirky.

National movements are fighting against such forms of disadvantage.

National movements were already fighting the ancient empires and their plunder. Until the French Revolution, however, their self-understanding was mostly social - the ”people” versus the ”ruler”, it was just that the ”people” happened to be provincially limited. However, the French and American revolutions combined with the subsequent Romanticism created a new political language: the ”people” were consciously bound to the land of the peripheral province as (potential) ”citizens” and defined on that basis.

Pioneers of this kind of struggle were the Spanish and German movements that fought Napoleon’s armies, but the national movement that would invent most of the movement’s themes was the Irish. It was the first movement to link the interests of an oppressed class, in this case the peasants, to the interests of the nation vis-à-vis the center, and expressed them in boycotts, strikes and a national language, the ”Celtic Renaissance” (Eastern European movements had thematized it ”national” but without making it a mass struggle).

Through the imperialist subjugation of the whole world by the European states during the 19th century, the national movements also spread all over the world. Because this imperialist subjugation was organized both through the state and economically, the national movements have both committed to building independent states and organizing economic development under their own auspices, strong enough to counter the center-controlled economies.

Most national movements have been organized by the educated middle class of the cities, who saw themselves as limited in their development of the discriminatory policies of the imperialist powers. Successful national movements have also been linked to peasant movements and / or labor movements and drawn them into the self-defense of the periphery.

The great period of success of the national movements was the period 1945-1975, when all colonial rule was abolished and national development became global over-ideology. Strong mobilizations in the South, mainly India and China, were aided by the North’s preoccupation with two world wars.

Since the 1970s, however, national movements have suffered great setbacks.
- National development was expensive and difficult and had to be paid for, usually by its own people,
- The new ”nations” therefore also recreated peripheries which in many cases developed new national movements – the so-called Fourth world,
- Different peripheries preferred to compete for success instead of uniting towards the center, which could thus easily continue to divide and rule and maintain a hierarchical world order,
- For the world’s established rulers, it became much more important to crack down on the periphery’s self-assertions during the recession that set in after 1973 and they put more effort into this in the form of the neoliberal agenda,
- For the educated middle class of the cities in the South, it has in many cases been more profitable to change sides, abandon the difficult national development and their own people and establish themselves as the local representatives of the transnational corporations at the expense of their own underclasses.

It is possible to see a new tendency towards self-assertion in the early 2000s, marked by the Southern countries’ refusal to join the Nordic countries’ WTO program. But this trend break has been preceded by strong peasant mobilizations. The future self-defense of the periphery must probably to a greater extent than hitherto be conducted by the direct producers themselves, for example in the form of trade union aspirations aimed at keeping more of the periphery’s surplus in the place where it is produced.

Reading
Stein Rokkan & Derek Urwin: Economy, territory, identity, Sage 1983
Anthony Smith: State and nation in the Third World, Wheatsheaf Books 1983
L.S. Stavrianos: Global rift, William Morrow 1981
Immanuel Wallerstein: Historical capitalism, Verso 1983
Erik Reinert: How rich countries got rich - and why poor countries stay poor, Carroll & Graff 2007
Vijay Prashad: The darker nations, The New Press 2007
Vijay Prashad: The poorer nations, Verso 2014

Link
Jan Kriegel: The Discrete Charm of the Washington Consensus

Documents
The Baku manifest 1920
The Bandung declaration 1955
The Havana declaration 2000

News links
Third World Network
Focus on the Global South
South Centre

 

Publicerad av Folkrörelsestudiegruppen: info@folkrorelser.org

www.folkrorelser.org